131 W. State Street
PO Box 50
Doylestown, PA 18901

info@ammlaw.com
215.230.7500 phone
215.230.7796 fax
855-210-7500 toll free

20-year-logo

Subscribe to Blog:

The information contained in this blog does not consitute legal advice.  For more information, please read our Disclaimer.

RSS
Email
Feedburner

Search Blog...

Blogger Bios

  • Alan Wandalowski Alan Wandalowski
    Alan concentrates his practice in Estate Planning, Estate Administration, Elder Law, Estate and Trust Litigation,…
  • Bill MacMinn Bill MacMinn
    Bill concentrates his practice in the area of litigation, including Commercial Litigation, Personal Injury, Products…
  • Donald B. Veix, Jr Donald B. Veix, Jr
    With over twenty-five years of experience, Don concentrates his practice in the areas of Commercial…
  • Joanne Murray Joanne Murray
    Joanne concentrates her practice in the areas of Business Law, Business Transactions, Contracts, Banking and…
  • Michael Klimpl Michael Klimpl
    Michael’s practice areas include Real Estate, Municipal Law, Zoning and Land Use, Employment Law, Civil Litigation,…
  • Patricia Collins Patricia Collins
    Patty has been practicing law since 1996 in the areas of Employment Law, Health Care…
  • Susan Maslow Susan Maslow
    Sue concentrates her practice primarily in general corporate transactional work and finance documentation in the…
  • Timothy White Timothy White
    Tim concentrates his practice in taxation, wealth preservation and estate planning, trust and estate administration…
Monday, October 17 2011 15:57

A Kinder, Gentler CPSIA? (Part 4 of 4)

Written by  Joanne Murray

The amendment to the CPSIA provides much-needed clarity and relief for many manufacturers, particularly small manufacturers and those in specific industries such as book publishers and bicycle and off-highway vehicle manufacturers. The determination that the 100 ppm lead content limit does not apply retroactively to products in inventory is certainly a welcome development for manufacturers. On the other hand, the new legislation does not contain some of the industry-friendly provisions contained in prior bills, such as delaying the implementation of the 100 ppm standard until 2012 and restricting the lead limits to products designed primarily for use by children age six and younger that can be placed into a child’s mouth. Nevertheless, the opportunity to provide comments and suggestions with respect to third party testing requirements offers manufacturers and other stakeholders the ability to voice their remaining concerns, and the new functional purpose exception will allow manufacturers to seek relief from the lead limits. I’m curious to see the comments of the various stakeholders…

 

Last modified on Monday, October 17 2011 16:17
Joanne Murray

Joanne Murray

Joanne concentrates her practice in the areas of Business Law, Business Transactions, Contracts, Banking and Finance and Consumer Product Safety. She has represented a variety of financial institutions, privately held businesses, physician practices, and nonprofit entities in a wide range of business transactions including stock and asset acquisitions, affiliations, financing and loan restructuring, software license agreements, nondisclosure agreements, employment contracts and leasing transactions.

To view Joanne Murray's full profile, Click Here

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

You are here:Blog»A Kinder, Gentler CPSIA? (Part 4 of 4)