Important:

Our office is currently closed, but we continue to provide legal services by working remotely.

In light of Governor Wolf’s emergency declaration and current recommendations our office is currently closed.  Our attorneys and staff continue to work remotely, however, and we can assure you they are set up to respond to your calls, emails and all communications.  For more details on AMM operations during this time, read our full update.  

Thank you for your understanding, and please take care.

Coronavirus, Business and Contracts: Navigating Uncharted Waters

Tuesday, 17 March 2020 14:08 Written by  Thomas P. Donnelly

The impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic is rippling through the United States economy.  Mass cancellations, closures, travel restrictions, containment zones and school closures at every level leave many business relationships interrupted.  Goods and services previously planned for and anticipated are no longer required.  Buyers are scrambling to cancel.  The grocery store shelves are empty and the markets experienced perhaps the most volatile week in history.  We are entering a period of great uncertainty.  

An excellent example on a huge scale is the cancellation of the NCAA Division 1 men’s basketball tournament. Ramifications include not only loss of revenue generated to the NCAA directly related to television advertising rights, but also direct impact to the communities where tournament games were to be conducted. According to an article appearing in the Washington Post on line on March 14, 2020 by Will Hobson and Ben Strauss, the NCAA had reserved a block of 32,000 rooms in the city of Atlanta alone. The financial impact on the city is projected to exceed one hundred million dollars. The impact trickles down to the restaurants, bars, nightclubs, convenience stores, merchants and a myriad of service providers.

There are several legal implications. In some cases the business partners negotiated written agreements which include “force majeure” or “Act of God” clauses. As any term of contract, the courts first look to the language the parties adopted to determine applicability and scope. A force majeure clause lists a series of events such as earthquakes, storms, floods, natural disasters, wars, or other “acts of God” which the parties to a contract have agreed upon as excuses for nonperformance. As force majeure is a contract term and a contract defense, whether a global pandemic excuses performance will depend on the language selected by the parties and the specific circumstances.

Force majeure is applied to relieve a part from the obligation to perform contractually specified obligations. The doctrine is not intended to be applied to relieve an obligation to make a payment required by contract.

Where there is no written agreement which provides guidance, such as in circumstances where the sum total of the terms of contract are as set forth on a purchase order or invoice without terms and conditions, the answer is less clear. The Uniform Commercial Code, which governs transactions in goods between merchants, includes a provision which speaks to “commercial impracticability”. Pursuant to the UCC, delay in delivery or non-delivery in whole or in part by a seller is not a breach of its duty under a contract for sale if performance as agreed has been made impracticable by the occurrence of a contingency the non-occurrence of which was a basic assumption on which the contract was made, or by compliance in good faith with any applicable foreign or domestic governmental regulation or order whether or not it later proves to be invalid. The below comment to the UCC describes the applicability of the principle of commercial impracticability;

Increased cost alone does not excuse performance unless the rise in cost is due to some unforeseen contingency which alters the essential nature of the performance. Neither is a rise or a collapse in the market in itself a justification, for that is exactly the type of business risk which business contracts made at fixed prices are intended to cover. But a severe shortage of raw materials or of supplies due to a contingency such as war, embargo, local crop failure, unforeseen shutdown of major sources of supply or the like, which either causes a marked increase in cost or altogether prevents the seller from securing supplies necessary to his performance, is within the contemplation of this section.

While the UCC applies to the sale of goods, the legal principle of commercial impracticability or impossibility of performance can be applied by analogy.

Cancellation of contracts causes financial impacts as well. College campus closures are a good example. Food service providers are no longer necessary as there are no students to feed. The caterer’s business has been “interrupted”. Many businesses acquire “business interruption insurance” to guard against such a sudden and substantial loss of revenue. However, the policy of insurance is a contract like any other and describes the basis of coverage as well as any applicable exclusions. One client I spoke to this week advised that their policy of business interruption insurance had an exclusion for interruption caused by “bacteria or virus”. That client is dependent on the availability of venues which the client does not control. It remains to be seen whether an executive order by a person of authority such as the Governor or the President of the United States, to the extent based on a “virus” will fall within the exclusion of the policy.

As we enter into this complex and turbulent time, we are bound to encounter novel and complex issues of law and contract. Business owners are encouraged to review their business plans, contemplate the potential impacts, review their commercial insurance policies and seek appropriate advice where necessary.

Last modified on Tuesday, 07 April 2020 21:16
Thomas P. Donnelly

Thomas P. Donnelly

Tom’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and transactions. In litigation, Tom represents both Plaintiffs and Defendants. Throughout his career, he has undertaken the representation of both individual and corporate clients in subject matters concerning fraud, contracts, employment agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, securities violations, real estate and insurer bad faith. Tom’s clients include individuals and businesses local to the Philadelphia area, as well as national corporations.

To view Thomas' full bio, click here.

Leave a comment

Blogger Bios

  • Alan Wandalowski Alan Wandalowski
    Alan concentrates his practice in Estate Planning, Estate Administration, Elder Law, Estate…
  • Bill MacMinn Bill MacMinn
    Bill concentrates his practice in the area of litigation, including Commercial Litigation,…
  • Christopher D. Wagner Christopher D. Wagner
    Christopher Wagner is an experienced and results-driven business law attorney with a comprehensive understanding…
  • Elaine T. Yandrisevits Elaine T. Yandrisevits
    As an estate planning attorney, Elaine Yandrisevits is committed to guiding individuals…
  • Elizabeth J. Fineman Elizabeth J. Fineman
    Elizabeth Fineman concentrates her practice on domestic relations matters and handles a…
  • Gabriel Montemuro Gabriel Montemuro
    Gabe’s practice focuses on litigation, including commercial litigation, personal injury, estate and…
  • Jessica A. Pritchard Jessica A. Pritchard
    Jessica A. Pritchard, focuses her practice exclusively in the area of family…
  • Joanne Murray Joanne Murray
    Joanne concentrates her practice in the areas of Business Law, Business Transactions,…
  • John Trainer John Trainer
    John’s concentrates his legal practice in estate planning, estate administration and elder…
  • Mariam Ibrahim Mariam Ibrahim
    Mariam Ibrahim is dedicated to helping clients and their families navigate the…
  • Michael Klimpl Michael Klimpl
    Michael’s practice areas include Real Estate, Municipal Law, Zoning and Land Use, Employment…
  • Michael W. Mills Michael W. Mills
    Mike is devoted to helping businesses build value and improve working capital,…
  • Patricia Collins Patricia Collins
    Patty has been practicing law since 1996 in the areas of Employment…
  • Peter J. Smith Peter J. Smith
    Pete is a business lawyer and trusted partner to his corporate clients…
  • Stephanie M. Shortall Stephanie M. Shortall
    Throughout her career, Stephanie has developed a practice focused on advising closely…
  • Susan Maslow Susan Maslow
    Sue concentrates her practice primarily in general corporate transactional work and finance…
  • Thomas P. Donnelly Thomas P. Donnelly
    Tom’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and transactions. In litigation, Tom represents…