Important:

Our office is currently closed, but we continue to provide legal services by working remotely.

In light of Governor Wolf’s emergency declaration and current recommendations our office is currently closed.  Our attorneys and staff continue to work remotely, however, and we can assure you they are set up to respond to your calls, emails and all communications.  For more details on AMM operations during this time, read our full update.  

Thank you for your understanding, and please take care.

PPP Funding Update – Relaxations on Certification of “Necessity”

Thursday, 14 May 2020 14:24 Written by  Michael W. Mills

May 14, 2020

Yesterday the Small Business Administration (SBA) issued updates to its Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) guidance on the Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP) Loans, and added Questions/Answers (Q&A) 45 and 46, with the latter Q&A being directly related to the certification issues, and to the corresponding May 14th deadline for the return of funds as a “safe harbor” from civil and criminal penalties relating to the certification of need.

As previously reported, the PPP applications required borrowers to certify that “current economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.”  Until its issuance of this Q&A, the SBA’s guidance suggested that it would seek to impose civil and criminal penalties relating to the certification as a first resort, if it determined that the loan was unnecessary.  In doing so, the SBA induced a sense of fear; and then further induced a sense of urgency by offering the safe harbor from such penalties, allowing borrowers to return the funds on or before May 7th to avoid such penalties.  Such deadline was further extended to May 14th.

The issuance of Q&A 46, which is restated at the end of this post, is a welcome and sensible shift from those prior SBA intimations, particularly for those with loans under $2,000,000.  While the May 14th “safe harbor” deadline remains, the risk to borrowers is now significantly lower.   The new guidance indicates that those who borrowed less than $2,000,000 (on an affiliated basis) will be “deemed” to have made the required certification of necessity in good faith, creating a new safe harbor based on the size of the loan.  Therefore, for such borrowers, it would seem that there’s no need to consider returning the funds by the May 14th deadline, and ostensibly such borrowers will not be examined by the SBA for compliance with the certification.

For those who borrowed more than $2,000,000, there is no such “deeming” of good faith, but the new guidance is still a significant improvement for such borrowers.  While it remains true that such borrowers may still need to make an adequate showing of need, the stakes are much different.  If the SBA were to later determine that such a borrower was not in need of the funds, the new guidance indicates that civil and criminal penalties will not be imposed if the borrower returns the funds.   Thus, the risk to such borrowers is substantially lessened, so long as the borrower remains able to repay the funds.  Of course, if a borrower is in a position to repay the funds later on, it does beg the very question of whether the borrower really needed the funds; and vice versa.  Nonetheless, it ratchets down the legal risk to borrowers, and makes the original May 14th deadline much less relevant. 
As per prior guidance, Borrowers with PPP loans over $2,000,000 should still immediately document and memorialize their need for the funds, including documentation of actions that would have been taken (e.g. layoffs, furloughs, etc.) had the PPP funding not been available, as well as impacts of the crisis on revenues, cash flow, workflows, etc.  While those who have borrowed less than $2,000,000 should not need to make a case for the necessity of the loan, it is still advisable for such borrowers to follow a similar practice.

The position as expressed by Q&A 46 is more aligned with the terms of the CARES Act than the SBA’s prior guidance, which is a positive turn of events.  Unfortunately, there are other areas where the SBA’s guidance is inconsistent with the CARES Act, and yesterday’s updated guidance has not addressed those other areas (e.g., the requirement that 75% of the loan be used for payroll costs in order to qualify for any forgiveness).  Further, we still hope to receive further SBA guidance (or legislation with technical corrections) regarding a number of forgiveness computation issues, as well as deductibility for tax purposes, and will plan to communicate further in that regard.

Michael Mills is a Partner with Antheil Maslow & MacMinn, LLP, practicing in their business law, estates & trusts and tax law departments.

U.S. Small Business Administration – Paycheck Protection Program Loans
FAQ 46.
Question: How will SBA review borrowers’ required good-faith certification concerning the necessity of their loan request?
Answer: When submitting a PPP application, all borrowers must certify in good faith that “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.” SBA, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, has determined that the following safe harbor will apply to SBA’s review of PPP loans with respect to this issue: Any borrower that, together with its affiliates,20 received PPP loans with an original principal amount of less than $2 million will be deemed to have made the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan request in good faith.
SBA has determined that this safe harbor is appropriate because borrowers with loans below this threshold are generally less likely to have had access to adequate sources of liquidity in the current economic environment than borrowers that obtained larger loans. This safe harbor will also promote economic certainty as PPP borrowers with more limited resources endeavor to retain and rehire employees. In addition, given the large volume of PPP loans, this approach will enable SBA to conserve its finite audit resources and focus its reviews on larger loans, where the compliance effort may yield higher returns.
Importantly, borrowers with loans greater than $2 million that do not satisfy this safe harbor may still have an adequate basis for making the required good-faith certification, based on their individual circumstances in light of the language of the certification and SBA guidance. SBA has previously stated that all PPP loans in excess of $2 million, and other PPP loans as appropriate, will be subject to review by SBA for compliance with program requirements set forth in the PPP Interim Final Rules and in the Borrower Application Form. If SBA determines in the course of its review that a borrower lacked an adequate basis for the required certification concerning the necessity of the loan request, SBA will seek repayment of the outstanding PPP loan balance and will inform the lender that the borrower is not eligible for loan forgiveness. If the borrower repays the loan after receiving notification from SBA, SBA will not pursue administrative enforcement or referrals to other agencies based on its determination with respect to the certification concerning necessity of the loan request. SBA’s determination concerning the certification regarding the necessity of the loan request will not affect SBA’s loan guarantee.

20  For purposes of this safe harbor, a borrower must include its affiliates to the extent required under the interim final rule on affiliates, 85 FR 20817 (April 15, 2020).

Last modified on Thursday, 14 May 2020 15:00
Michael W. Mills

Michael W. Mills

Mike is devoted to helping businesses build value and improve working capital, and helping individuals preserve and protect their family wealth.  Foundational to this mission is his concentration in the area of taxation, which impacts so much of business and personal financial planning.  In representing businesses, this includes counseling clients on the tax aspects of business formation, financing, reorganization, and acquisition transactions, as well as business succession planning.  With individual clients, this includes assistance with income tax planning, and planning for estate, inheritance, and other death taxes.

Full Profile

Leave a comment

Blogger Bios

  • Alan Wandalowski Alan Wandalowski
    Alan concentrates his practice in Estate Planning, Estate Administration, Elder Law, Estate…
  • Bill MacMinn Bill MacMinn
    Bill concentrates his practice in the area of litigation, including Commercial Litigation,…
  • Christopher D. Wagner Christopher D. Wagner
    Christopher Wagner is an experienced and results-driven business law attorney with a comprehensive understanding…
  • Elaine T. Yandrisevits Elaine T. Yandrisevits
    As an estate planning attorney, Elaine Yandrisevits is committed to guiding individuals…
  • Elizabeth J. Fineman Elizabeth J. Fineman
    Elizabeth Fineman concentrates her practice on domestic relations matters and handles a…
  • Gabriel Montemuro Gabriel Montemuro
    Gabe’s practice focuses on litigation, including commercial litigation, personal injury, estate and…
  • Jessica A. Pritchard Jessica A. Pritchard
    Jessica A. Pritchard, focuses her practice exclusively in the area of family…
  • Joanne Murray Joanne Murray
    Joanne concentrates her practice in the areas of Business Law, Business Transactions,…
  • John Trainer John Trainer
    John’s concentrates his legal practice in estate planning, estate administration and elder…
  • Mariam Ibrahim Mariam Ibrahim
    Mariam Ibrahim is dedicated to helping clients and their families navigate the…
  • Michael Klimpl Michael Klimpl
    Michael’s practice areas include Real Estate, Municipal Law, Zoning and Land Use, Employment…
  • Michael W. Mills Michael W. Mills
    Mike is devoted to helping businesses build value and improve working capital,…
  • Patricia Collins Patricia Collins
    Patty has been practicing law since 1996 in the areas of Employment…
  • Peter J. Smith Peter J. Smith
    Pete is a business lawyer and trusted partner to his corporate clients…
  • Stephanie M. Shortall Stephanie M. Shortall
    Throughout her career, Stephanie has developed a practice focused on advising closely…
  • Susan Maslow Susan Maslow
    Sue concentrates her practice primarily in general corporate transactional work and finance…
  • Thomas P. Donnelly Thomas P. Donnelly
    Tom’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and transactions. In litigation, Tom represents…