Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission Adopts Specific Definitions of Protected Classes

Tuesday, April 25 2023 14:17 Written by  Patricia Collins

Reprinted from the April 20th edition of The Legal Intelligencer. (c) 2023 ALM Media Properties. Further duplication without permission is prohibited.


On March 23, 2022, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (“PHRC”) proposed new regulations to expand the definition of certain protected classes. The Amendments will create new Pennsylvania Code Sections at 16 Pa. Code §§ 41.201 – 41.207, and would expand the terms “sex”; “religious creed” and “race” for purposes of the Pennsylvania Humans Relations Act (“PHRA”) and the Pennsylvania Fair Educational Opportunities Act (“PFEOA”). The regulations were approved on December 8, 2022. The regulations are not yet in effect, but will become effective 60 days after publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

The PHRA prohibits discrimination in employment because of race, color, religious creed, ancestry, age, sex, national origin or non-job related handicap or disability. 43 Pa. Stat. § 955(a). The regulations relating to the PHRA previously provided definitions only for the terms “pregnancy” and “disability due to pregnancy or childbirth”. 16 Pa. Code 41.101. The definition of the other protected classes was left to the PHRC’s guidance and cases interpreting the statute.

The amendments to Title 16 of the Pennsylvania Code would add a new subchapter, entitled “Protected Classes”, for the purpose of ensuring that all unlawful discriminatory practices proscribed by the PHRA and PFEOA are “interpreted and applied consistently”, and that all complaints filed with the PHRC “are investigated consistent with the rules outlined herein.” The regulations calls for liberal construction to accomplish the purpose of the PHRA and PFEOA.

Under the new regulations “religious creed” as used in the PHRA, includes the failure to provide a reasonable accommodation for a religious observance or practice. This definition is consistent with the case law, but the dramatic changes, at least in terms of their specificity, related to sex and race discrimination.

Under the new regulations, “sex” as used in the PHRA, includes discrimination based upon pregnancy; childbirth; breastfeeding; sex assigned at birth; gender, which includes gender identity; affectional or sexual orientation, which includes heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality and asexuality; and, differences of sex development which include “variations of sex characteristics or other intersex characteristics”. Each of these terms is defined specifically in the regulation. For example, “gender identity” means “having or being perceived as having a gender-related identity, appearance, expression or behavior which may or may not be stereotypically associated with the person’s sex assigned at birth.” Interestingly, the regulations include a specific protection relating to the perception or presumption of an employee’s affectional or sexual orientation. The regulations, with great specificity, expand the definition of the protected class for sex discrimination, with a focus on protections for the LGBTQ community.

Under the new regulations, “race” as used in the PHRA, includes ancestry; national origin and ethnic characteristics; interracial “marriage or association”; “traits historically associated with race” including hair texture and protective hairstyles; persons of Hispanic national origin or ancestry; and, persons of any other national origin or ancestry. Each of these terms is also defined in the regulation. For example, “ethnic characteristics” refers to skin and hair color, body size and facial features, linguistic characteristics, cultural characteristics and environmental characteristics such as living in the same area or region. “Traits associated with race” refers to hair texture and protective hairstyles, such as braids, locks or twists. The regulation’s focus on protecting cultural and ethnic traditions, down to protecting discrimination based on the geographic area where an employee lives, creates interesting challenges. It would be nearly impossible to avoid address information in the hiring process.

The PHRC has taken the position that the PHRA already prohibited discrimination based on these considerations, and conducts its investigations based on these criteria. In 2020, the United States Supreme Court decided in Bostock v. Clayton County, that discrimination “because of sex” prohibited by Title VII included discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Philadelphia’s Fair Practices Ordinance also prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, along with other categories. Just based on existing law, employers should have training and policies that prohibit gender identity and sexual orientation discrimination, but the new regulations provide a level of specificity that is new to Pennsylvania law.

With regard to race discrimination, some jurisdictions include protections from discrimination on the basis of “traits associated with race” such as hair texture and protective hairstyles, in laws prohibiting discrimination. Some states and municipalities have versions of a “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair” Act or CROWN Act. The United States House of Representatives passed a CROWN Act in March of 2022, but the bill has not moved further. The new Pennsylvania regulations, and proposed and existing CROWN Acts, as well as the language of the PHRA and federal anti-discrimination statutes, require employers to consider training and policies that prohibit discrimination on the basis of “traits associated with race.”

Given that many of these categories are already protected in one way or another by federal, state or local laws, compliance should not present a challenge. However, handbooks and trainings may require updating to address these issues. While the proposed regulations may not change Pennsylvania law dramatically, the specificity of the definitions provides a good template for training and employer policies.

Patricia Collins is a Partner and Employment Law Chair with Antheil Maslow & MacMinn, LLP, based in Doylestown, PA. Her practice focuses primarily on employment, commercial litigation and health care law. Patricia Collins can be contacted at 215.230.7500 ext. 126.

 

 

Last modified on Thursday, December 28 2023 16:51
Patricia Collins

Patricia Collins

Patty has been practicing law since 1996 in the areas of Employment Law, Health Care and Litigation, with extensive experience in advising employers and health care providers as well as complex litigation in federal and state courts. Patty’s knowledge of employment law includes the Employee Retirement Income Security Act; federal and state employment discrimination laws, and employment contracts and wage claims.

To view Patricia Collins' full profile, click here.

Leave a comment

Blogger Bios

  • Adam M. Weiss Adam M. Weiss
    Adam focuses his practice on business and corporate law, serving as a…
  • Bill MacMinn Bill MacMinn
    Bill concentrates his practice in the area of litigation, including Commercial Litigation,…
  • Elaine T. Yandrisevits Elaine T. Yandrisevits
    As an estate planning attorney, Elaine Yandrisevits is committed to guiding individuals…
  • Elizabeth J. Fineman Elizabeth J. Fineman
    Elizabeth Fineman concentrates her practice on domestic relations matters and handles a…
  • Gabriel Montemuro Gabriel Montemuro
    Gabe’s practice focuses on litigation, including commercial litigation, personal injury, estate and…
  • Janel Clause Janel Clause
    Janel Clause focuses her practice on business and corporate law, serving as…
  • Jennifer Dickerson Jennifer Dickerson
    Jennifer Dickerson is committed to a career focused on helping individuals and…
  • Jessica A. Pritchard Jessica A. Pritchard
    Jessica A. Pritchard, focuses her practice exclusively in the area of family…
  • Joanne Murray Joanne Murray
    Joanne concentrates her practice in the areas of Business Law, Business Transactions,…
  • Jocelin A. Price Jocelin A. Price
    As an estate planning practitioner, Jocelin Price knows that the work of…
  • Lisa A. Bothwell Lisa A. Bothwell
    Lisa Bothwell counsels corporate/business clients on the formation, operation, acquisition, and sale…
  • Lynelle Gleason Lynelle Gleason
    Lynelle A. Gleason has spent her legal career in Bucks County, representing…
  • Megan Weiler Megan Weiler
    Megan Weiler is a skilled advocate dedicated to guiding clients and their…
  • Melanie J. Wender Melanie J. Wender
    Melanie J. Wender is a dedicated and supportive advocate for individuals and families…
  • Michael W. Mills Michael W. Mills
    Mike is devoted to helping businesses build value and improve working capital,…
  • Patricia Collins Patricia Collins
    Patty has been practicing law since 1996 in the areas of Employment…
  • Peter J. Smith Peter J. Smith
    Pete is a business lawyer and trusted partner to his corporate clients…
  • Stephen M. Zaffuto Stephen M. Zaffuto
    Stephen Zaffuto is a skilled and insightful Corporate and Real Estate attorney…
  • Susan Maslow Susan Maslow
    Sue concentrates her practice primarily in general corporate transactional work and finance…
  • Thomas P. Donnelly Thomas P. Donnelly
    Tom’s practice focuses on commercial litigation and transactions. In litigation, Tom represents…